Skip to main content

tastyworks vs interactive brokers - options trader comparison

been using both for 2+ years.

different tools for different jobs.

tastyworks
#

what I use it for:

  • premium selling strategies
  • quick options trades
  • mobile trading (when traveling)

pricing:

  • $1 per contract to open, $0 to close
  • no ticket fees
  • no exercise/assignment fees

pros:

  • designed by options traders, for options traders
  • probability of profit displays everywhere
  • IV rank/percentile front and center
  • mobile app is actually good
  • trade execution is fast

cons:

  • API is limited compared to IB
  • no futures options
  • charting is basic
  • research tools are minimal

interactive brokers
#

what I use it for:

  • algo execution (primary)
  • futures
  • complex multi-leg strategies
  • overnight risk management

pricing:

  • $0.65 per contract (volume discount)
  • no ticket fees
  • low margin rates

pros:

  • best API in the industry
  • global market access
  • lowest costs at volume
  • professional platform
  • futures + futures options

cons:

  • steep learning curve
  • TWS is bloated
  • mobile app is meh
  • customer support is slow

head-to-head
#

feature tastyworks interactive brokers
options pricing $1 open, $0 close $0.65/contract
API quality basic excellent
mobile app excellent poor
options focus designed for it general platform
futures no yes
learning curve easy steep
probability tools excellent basic

my setup
#

tastyworks: manual options trades, premium selling

IB: algo execution, futures, overnight positions

which to choose?
#

if you’re starting out: tastyworks

better education, easier platform, options-focused.

if you’re automating: interactive brokers

API makes everything possible.

if you can only pick one: depends on your style

  • premium sellers → tastyworks
  • algo traders → IB
  • hybrid (like me) → both

I run ~70% of my options volume through IB (algo-driven) and ~30% through tastyworks (manual premium sells).

the NexusFi broker reviews section has user experiences with both. worth reading before committing.

verdict
#

tastyworks: 8/10 for manual options trading

interactive brokers: 9/10 for algo trading

both: A+ for what they’re designed to do.


2:52am friday. tastyworks vs interactive brokers after 2+ years. tastyworks: best for manual options ($1/open, $0/close), mobile, probability tools. IB: best for algos ($0.65/contract), API, futures. I use both - 70% IB (algo), 30% tastyworks (manual). if starting: tastyworks. if automating: IB.

-AK

Related

interactive brokers api - 2 years deep review
been on IB for 2 years now. primary broker for options and futures. here’s what I’ve learned. why IB # pros:
polygon.io vs thetadata - options data deep comparison
been running both for 8 months now. time for an honest comparison. why both # polygon.io: primary equities and options quotes
thetadata review - options greeks data for algo trading
been using thetadata for 8 months now. here’s the real review for options algo traders. what is thetadata # options-focused market data provider.
tastyworks vs interactive brokers - python algo trader comparison 2025
been using both for 18 months. time for honest comparison. python automation perspective. my setup # tastyworks: options trading (premium selling).
interactive brokers - 2 years review from algo trader perspective
2 years with Interactive Brokers as primary broker. time for honest review. python algo trading perspective. why IB for algo trading # chose IB january 2023 for 3 reasons:
polygon.io vs iex cloud - 2 year data feed comparison
been using polygon.io as primary data source since 2023. added iex cloud as backup last year. here’s how they compare for algo trading. polygon.io (primary) # what I use it for: