Skip to main content

polygon.io vs alpha vantage - which data feed for algo trading

data feeds = foundation of algo trading.

garbage data = garbage trades.

i’ve used both polygon.io and alpha vantage extensively.

spent months researching data feeds when i started trading. NexusFi community helped narrow down options to these two.

here’s the real comparison.

what i need from data feeds
#

1. historical data

backtesting requires years of data.

need:

  • daily bars (2+ years)
  • intraday bars (1+ year)
  • options data (greeks, chain)

2. real-time data

live trading requires:

  • <100ms latency
  • reliable websocket
  • no gaps/missing bars

3. API quality

python integration must be:

  • well documented
  • stable endpoints
  • reasonable rate limits

4. cost

paying for what i actually use.

not enterprise pricing for retail needs.

polygon.io - my primary feed
#

what i use it for:

stocks, options, real-time websocket.

pricing (my tier):

$199/month - starter plan

  • unlimited historical
  • real-time websocket
  • options data included

pros:

  1. speed: 50-80ms latency on websocket

  2. reliability: 99.8% uptime (i track it)

  3. options data: full chain, greeks, IV

  4. documentation: excellent python examples

  5. rate limits: generous (100 req/min)

cons:

  1. cost: $199/month (not cheap for retail)

  2. learning curve: REST + websocket combo

  3. options lag: greeks update every 5min (not real-time)

code example:

from polygon import RESTClient
from polygon import WebSocketClient
import asyncio

# REST client for historical data
rest_client = RESTClient(api_key="YOUR_KEY")

def get_historical_bars(symbol, from_date, to_date):
    """
    Get historical daily bars from Polygon
    """
    aggs = rest_client.get_aggs(
        ticker=symbol,
        multiplier=1,
        timespan="day",
        from_=from_date,
        to=to_date,
        limit=50000
    )

    bars = []
    for agg in aggs:
        bars.append({
            'timestamp': agg.timestamp,
            'open': agg.open,
            'high': agg.high,
            'low': agg.low,
            'close': agg.close,
            'volume': agg.volume
        })

    return bars

# Websocket client for real-time data
def handle_msg(msgs):
    """Process real-time messages"""
    for msg in msgs:
        if msg['ev'] == 'A':  # Aggregate (bar)
            print(f"Symbol: {msg['sym']}")
            print(f"Close: ${msg['c']:.2f}")
            print(f"Volume: {msg['v']:,}")

async def run_websocket():
    """Real-time data stream"""
    ws = WebSocketClient(
        api_key="YOUR_KEY",
        feed='stocks',
        on_message=handle_msg
    )

    # Subscribe to SPY 1-minute bars
    ws.subscribe('A.SPY')

    await ws.run()

# Usage
historical = get_historical_bars('SPY', '2023-01-01', '2024-02-11')
print(f"Retrieved {len(historical)} bars")

# Real-time streaming
asyncio.run(run_websocket())

real performance (my experience):

january 2024:

  • 2.3M API calls
  • 99.9% success rate
  • avg latency: 67ms
  • 0 outages

worth $199/month for serious trading.

alpha vantage - backup feed
#

what i use it for:

backup historical data, free tier testing.

pricing (my tier):

free tier:

  • 25 API calls per day
  • 5 calls per minute

premium: $49.99/month

  • 1200 calls per day
  • still rate limited

pros:

  1. cost: free tier exists

  2. simplicity: REST-only, easy to learn

  3. crypto included: btc/eth data free

  4. fundamental data: earnings, balance sheets

cons:

  1. rate limits: brutal (5/min on free, still limited on paid)

  2. no websocket: REST polling only (high latency)

  3. reliability: occasional downtime/slow responses

  4. no options: stocks only (no greeks, no chain)

code example:

import requests
import time

ALPHA_VANTAGE_KEY = "YOUR_KEY"

def get_intraday_data(symbol, interval='5min'):
    """
    Get intraday bars from Alpha Vantage
    Rate limited to 5 calls per minute
    """
    url = f"https://www.alphavantage.co/query"
    params = {
        'function': 'TIME_SERIES_INTRADAY',
        'symbol': symbol,
        'interval': interval,
        'apikey': ALPHA_VANTAGE_KEY,
        'outputsize': 'full'
    }

    response = requests.get(url, params=params)
    data = response.json()

    # Check for rate limit
    if 'Note' in data:
        print("Rate limit hit - waiting 60 seconds")
        time.sleep(60)
        return get_intraday_data(symbol, interval)

    # Parse time series
    time_series = data.get(f'Time Series ({interval})', {})

    bars = []
    for timestamp, values in time_series.items():
        bars.append({
            'timestamp': timestamp,
            'open': float(values['1. open']),
            'high': float(values['2. high']),
            'low': float(values['3. low']),
            'close': float(values['4. close']),
            'volume': int(values['5. volume'])
        })

    return bars

def get_daily_data(symbol):
    """
    Get daily historical data
    Full history (20+ years available)
    """
    url = f"https://www.alphavantage.co/query"
    params = {
        'function': 'TIME_SERIES_DAILY_ADJUSTED',
        'symbol': symbol,
        'apikey': ALPHA_VANTAGE_KEY,
        'outputsize': 'full'
    }

    response = requests.get(url, params=params)
    data = response.json()

    time_series = data.get('Time Series (Daily)', {})

    bars = []
    for timestamp, values in time_series.items():
        bars.append({
            'timestamp': timestamp,
            'open': float(values['1. open']),
            'high': float(values['2. high']),
            'low': float(values['3. low']),
            'close': float(values['4. close']),
            'adjusted_close': float(values['5. adjusted close']),
            'volume': int(values['6. volume'])
        })

    return bars

# Usage with rate limit handling
spy_intraday = get_intraday_data('SPY', '5min')
print(f"Retrieved {len(spy_intraday)} 5-minute bars")

time.sleep(12)  # Wait for rate limit (5 calls/min = 12 sec between)

spy_daily = get_daily_data('SPY')
print(f"Retrieved {len(spy_daily)} daily bars")

real performance (my experience):

free tier:

  • 25 calls per day = useless for live trading
  • frequent “please wait” responses
  • occasional 500 errors

premium tier ($49/month):

  • 1200 calls per day = ~50/hour
  • still too limited for real-time
  • better for EOD strategies only

good for testing, not for production.

head-to-head comparison
#

Feature Polygon.io Alpha Vantage
Price $199/month Free / $49.99/month
Historical data Unlimited Limited calls
Real-time Websocket, <100ms REST polling, 1-5 sec
Options data Full chain + greeks None
Rate limits 100/min 5/min (free), 75/min (paid)
Reliability 99.8% ~95%
Latency 50-80ms 1000-5000ms
Python support Excellent Basic
Learning curve Moderate Easy

when to use each
#

polygon.io:

  • serious algo trading
  • options strategies
  • real-time execution
  • need reliability

alpha vantage:

  • learning/testing
  • EOD strategies only
  • tight budget
  • fundamental analysis

my current setup
#

primary: polygon.io ($199/month)

backup: alpha vantage free tier

why both?

polygon outage = switch to alpha vantage for EOD data.

happened once in 2023.

saved my ass.

redundancy matters.

other feeds i’ve tested
#

IEX cloud:

  • good real-time
  • expensive for retail
  • limited historical

yahoo finance (yfinance python):

  • free
  • unreliable
  • rate limited randomly
  • banned my IP twice

quandl:

  • expensive
  • academic data focus
  • not for day trading

thetadata:

  • options specialist
  • great for greeks
  • too expensive ($150/month just options)

polygon wins for all-around use.

cost justification
#

polygon: $199/month

lost $40k march 2023 on bad backtest (garbage data contributed).

$199/month = $2,388/year

saved that in one trade by having reliable data.

worth it.

rate limit handling
#

polygon rate limits: 100 req/min

never hit it in production.

alpha vantage: 5 req/min free, 75 paid

hit it constantly.

solution for alpha vantage:

import time
from datetime import datetime

class RateLimitedClient:
    """
    Wrapper for Alpha Vantage with automatic rate limiting
    """
    def __init__(self, api_key, calls_per_minute=5):
        self.api_key = api_key
        self.calls_per_minute = calls_per_minute
        self.min_interval = 60.0 / calls_per_minute  # Seconds between calls
        self.last_call_time = 0

    def call_api(self, url, params):
        """
        Make API call with automatic rate limiting
        """
        # Calculate wait time
        elapsed = time.time() - self.last_call_time
        if elapsed < self.min_interval:
            wait_time = self.min_interval - elapsed
            print(f"Rate limit: waiting {wait_time:.1f} seconds")
            time.sleep(wait_time)

        # Make call
        params['apikey'] = self.api_key
        response = requests.get(url, params=params)

        # Update last call time
        self.last_call_time = time.time()

        return response.json()

# Usage
client = RateLimitedClient(api_key="YOUR_KEY", calls_per_minute=5)

# This will automatically space calls 12 seconds apart
for symbol in ['SPY', 'QQQ', 'IWM', 'DIA', 'GLD']:
    data = client.call_api(
        "https://www.alphavantage.co/query",
        {'function': 'TIME_SERIES_DAILY', 'symbol': symbol}
    )
    print(f"Retrieved {symbol} data")

makes alpha vantage tolerable.

data quality comparison
#

tested on same day (feb 1, 2024):

SPY close price discrepancies:

polygon: $491.62

alpha vantage: $491.62

yahoo finance: $491.58 (off by $0.04)

polygon and alpha vantage match.

yahoo occasionally wrong.

never use yahoo for production.

tonight
#

polygon.io = primary feed, $199/month, worth every dollar.

alpha vantage = backup, free tier adequate for emergencies.

yahoo finance = never for production.

data quality = edge protection.

garbage data destroys accounts.


2:47am sunday. data feed comparison. polygon.io $199/month primary feed - 50-80ms latency, options data, 99.8% reliability. alpha vantage backup - free tier adequate for testing, rate limits brutal for production. lost $40k march 2023 partly from bad data - $199/month cheap insurance.

-AK

Related

refactored data pipeline to async - 3x faster market data processing
been running synchronous data fetching since january. works but slow during market open. refactored to async this week. 3x speed improvement. the problem with sync code # # Old synchronous approach def fetch_market_data(symbols): results = [] for symbol in symbols: data = fetch_from_api(symbol) # Blocks here results.append(data) return results # With 10 symbols, takes 10 * 180ms = 1,800ms total each API call blocks until complete.
added redis caching - cut market data latency by 60%
been noticing market data latency creeping up. average fetch time: 180ms from polygon API. slowing down entry execution. the problem # every time algo needs current price:
rebuilt backtesting pipeline - 10x faster parameter optimization
spent last 3 days rebuilding backtest optimization pipeline. went from 6 hours to 35 minutes for full parameter sweep. the problem # old approach: sequential parameter testing.
using python async for real-time market data
rewrote my market data pipeline to use async. 3x faster, way cleaner code. the problem # old synchronous code:
how i organize my trading code on github
got asked on r/algotrading how i organize my trading repos. here’s my setup after 4 months of refactoring. repo structure # i have 4 main repos:
data feed comparison - polygon vs alpha vantage
your backtest is only as good as your data. spent $200/month on polygon.io and holy shit the difference vs free data. what i was using (bad) # alpha vantage free tier